<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Bond is Back&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Or is He?</title> <atom:link href="http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Noble</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27410</link> <dc:creator>Noble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:50:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27410</guid> <description>Hi all! The babes are here! This is my favorite site to visit. I make sure I am alone in case I get too hot. Post your favorite link here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all! The babes are here! This is my favorite site to visit. I make sure I am alone in case I get too hot. Post your favorite link here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cruisin'Chris</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27409</link> <dc:creator>Cruisin'Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27409</guid> <description>John - thanks for the link to all the blogs - however - not meaning to beat a dead horse here - but Princess STILL doesn&#039;t have one.  What&#039;s up with that?  Seriously?  When do they plan to start one?  Soon, I would think.  It&#039;s kind of a glaring oversight.Good luck mulling through your decision re: work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; thanks for the link to all the blogs &#8211; however &#8211; not meaning to beat a dead horse here &#8211; but Princess STILL doesn&#8217;t have one.  What&#8217;s up with that?  Seriously?  When do they plan to start one?  Soon, I would think.  It&#8217;s kind of a glaring oversight.</p><p>Good luck mulling through your decision re: work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27408</link> <dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:37:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27408</guid> <description>[...]  Bond is Back&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Or is He? Just before I start venting let me start by saying Good Morning less I forget to do so [...] [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Bond is Back&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Or is He? Just before I start venting let me start by saying Good Morning less I forget to do so [...] [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deborah Smith</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27407</link> <dc:creator>Deborah Smith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:48:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27407</guid> <description>John,
Hey, another great blog: http://www.avidcruiser.com/albert/That is Captain Albert of the Veendam
I read it everyday, and is awesome---just like yours!
Take care--
Deb</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br
/> Hey, another great blog: <a
href="http://www.avidcruiser.com/albert/" rel="nofollow">http://www.avidcruiser.com/albert/</a></p><p>That is Captain Albert of the Veendam<br
/> I read it everyday, and is awesome&#8212;just like yours!<br
/> Take care&#8211;<br
/> Deb</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tina</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27406</link> <dc:creator>Tina</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:47:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27406</guid> <description>Dear John,
let me say i agree with you on almost all of your opinions of the new Bond movie....i too want my Bond back...i personaly think that Mr. Craig is an excellent Bond, however they just give him crappy movies, I need gadgets and action, by the way, whats the deal with having the scrolling dots at the end of the movie insted of the begining, and also, where was the Bond theme song we have all come to know and love.... only in there once!! (not counting the end credits)   I think the directors are trying to change a great thing...classic Bond...I want a good 1970&#039;s Bond with all the gadgets, sex, and storyline intact.In total I give this movie a 6 out of 10.  It is worth renting when on dvd/bluray but only because it is still Bond  :-)P.S.  On a lighter note...Carnival rates a 10 out of 10 and I am submitting your name: Mr. John Heald as the next Bond!Derek (son of  Tina)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John,<br
/> let me say i agree with you on almost all of your opinions of the new Bond movie&#8230;.i too want my Bond back&#8230;</p><p>i personaly think that Mr. Craig is an excellent Bond, however they just give him crappy movies, I need gadgets and action, by the way, whats the deal with having the scrolling dots at the end of the movie insted of the begining, and also, where was the Bond theme song we have all come to know and love&#8230;. only in there once!! (not counting the end credits)   I think the directors are trying to change a great thing&#8230;classic Bond&#8230;I want a good 1970&#8242;s Bond with all the gadgets, sex, and storyline intact.</p><p>In total I give this movie a 6 out of 10.  It is worth renting when on dvd/bluray but only because it is still Bond <img
src="http://johnhealdsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?84cd58" alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>P.S.  On a lighter note&#8230;Carnival rates a 10 out of 10 and I am submitting your name: Mr. John Heald as the next Bond!</p><p>Derek (son of  Tina)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Catmama044</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27405</link> <dc:creator>Catmama044</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27405</guid> <description>John,&quot;Just for the fun of it&quot; sounds like it will be a huge success.I think I can wait til this Bond movie comes out on DVD. No rush here...I was a Sir Sean fan.Please say hello to Heidi and the baby. Have a great holiday.  We&#039;ll enjoy whatever blogs you are able to post.Have a safe flight,Lori</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p><p>&#8220;Just for the fun of it&#8221; sounds like it will be a huge success.</p><p>I think I can wait til this Bond movie comes out on DVD. No rush here&#8230;I was a Sir Sean fan.</p><p>Please say hello to Heidi and the baby. Have a great holiday.  We&#8217;ll enjoy whatever blogs you are able to post.</p><p>Have a safe flight,</p><p> Lori</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: More And Again</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27404</link> <dc:creator>More And Again</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:34:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27404</guid> <description>Well, I understand why you don&#039;t like Daniel Craig&#039;s Bond, but I have to disagree with you for the simple fact that this is supposed to be Bond when he&#039;s fresh spanking new, and still a little green and rough around the edges, since Casino Royale is supposed to have taken place before all the other Bond films.Perhaps the reason he can &quot;rumpy pumpy&quot; as often as he wants in the other films is because when he first started out he fell in love, had his heart broken, and swore off love completely. Perhaps his car doesn&#039;t have any gadgets because they weren&#039;t created yet?I think Daniel Craig does a great job of blending the rough edges of being a rookie with the je ne seis quoi that Bond&#039;s have (because, we assume, Bond is born with it). I would find it hard to believe that anyone just started out as this master with all the tools, tricks, and &quot;rumpy pumpy&quot; already at his disposal. Some things do have to be worked towards and developed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I understand why you don&#8217;t like Daniel Craig&#8217;s Bond, but I have to disagree with you for the simple fact that this is supposed to be Bond when he&#8217;s fresh spanking new, and still a little green and rough around the edges, since Casino Royale is supposed to have taken place before all the other Bond films.</p><p>Perhaps the reason he can &#8220;rumpy pumpy&#8221; as often as he wants in the other films is because when he first started out he fell in love, had his heart broken, and swore off love completely. Perhaps his car doesn&#8217;t have any gadgets because they weren&#8217;t created yet?</p><p>I think Daniel Craig does a great job of blending the rough edges of being a rookie with the je ne seis quoi that Bond&#8217;s have (because, we assume, Bond is born with it). I would find it hard to believe that anyone just started out as this master with all the tools, tricks, and &#8220;rumpy pumpy&#8221; already at his disposal. Some things do have to be worked towards and developed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cheryl D.</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27403</link> <dc:creator>Cheryl D.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:40:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27403</guid> <description>Hello John, Heidi, and Bloggers,John, please forgive me if I misunderstood, but I thought you promised to give us more details on the NOLA Bloggers cruise on Saturday. If you did, could we please have them? Pretty please?Of course you can take Sundays off. No one should have to work seven days a week. You can blog for 6 days, and rest on the 7th. And it will be good.It&#039;s about time they gave you the title. You have been their spokesperson for some time. It&#039;s just official now. (Hooray!)John, please reply: Have they changed the itinerary on the Blogger&#039;s Cruise? I can only get the shore excursions for Cozamel to come up, but not Progresso.Thank you for everything you do. This blog is often the highlight of my day. I&#039;m sure it is for others as well.Cheryl D.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello John, Heidi, and Bloggers,</p><p>John, please forgive me if I misunderstood, but I thought you promised to give us more details on the NOLA Bloggers cruise on Saturday. If you did, could we please have them? Pretty please?</p><p>Of course you can take Sundays off. No one should have to work seven days a week. You can blog for 6 days, and rest on the 7th. And it will be good.</p><p>It&#8217;s about time they gave you the title. You have been their spokesperson for some time. It&#8217;s just official now. (Hooray!)</p><p>John, please reply: Have they changed the itinerary on the Blogger&#8217;s Cruise? I can only get the shore excursions for Cozamel to come up, but not Progresso.</p><p>Thank you for everything you do. This blog is often the highlight of my day. I&#8217;m sure it is for others as well.</p><p>Cheryl D.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peanuts</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27402</link> <dc:creator>Peanuts</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27402</guid> <description>Good Afternoon John,I&#039;m with you on this &quot;new&quot; Bond!  Give me Sean or Pierce any day.  They were &quot;classy&quot; and they still are.  I don&#039;t even like Daniel&#039;s looks.  He seems more suited to the &quot;seedier&quot; roles.  He would make a good Bond enemy not Bond himself.  I haven&#039;t seen either movie nor do I want to.  I will watch Bond re-runs with Sean and Pierce, thank you very much. :)&quot;Just for the Fun of it&quot;  sounds like Carnival is developing a winner! and it sounds like Fun, not only for the guests receiving the &quot;Fun&quot; but for everyone who is there to witness it.  Brilliant!!!!Have a safe flight home and give Heidi and Thingy our love.Joan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Afternoon John,</p><p>I&#8217;m with you on this &#8220;new&#8221; Bond!  Give me Sean or Pierce any day.  They were &#8220;classy&#8221; and they still are.  I don&#8217;t even like Daniel&#8217;s looks.  He seems more suited to the &#8220;seedier&#8221; roles.  He would make a good Bond enemy not Bond himself.  I haven&#8217;t seen either movie nor do I want to.  I will watch Bond re-runs with Sean and Pierce, thank you very much. <img
src="http://johnhealdsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif?84cd58" alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p><p>&#8220;Just for the Fun of it&#8221;  sounds like Carnival is developing a winner! and it sounds like Fun, not only for the guests receiving the &#8220;Fun&#8221; but for everyone who is there to witness it.  Brilliant!!!!</p><p>Have a safe flight home and give Heidi and Thingy our love.</p><p>Joan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peg Dunbar</title><link>http://johnhealdsblog.com/2008/11/16/bond-is-backor-is-he/#comment-27401</link> <dc:creator>Peg Dunbar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:14:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://johnheald.wordpress.com/?p=7263#comment-27401</guid> <description>Good Morning John, I will assume that when you read the reply&#039;s, you will be in the air going home to your Heidi. I can only imagine how much you have missed her, and she you.I have always thought that Sean was the best Bond, he was sexy has all get out and even today he still is. Roger was very good and I did enjoy him as Bond. But then nobody asked my opinion when they started changing the Bond actors. Go with what you know, and what the audience wants. It really is that simple, you do not have to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. The name&#039;s Bond, James Bond, classic line. I would think that they would not allow an Englishman in the movie theater knowing they would have it embedded in their brains just what Mr. Bond has said in all the other movies.Safe flight w/o any problems. But then with your luck, that probably will not happen. There is just something about John and flying in the same sentence and that is where the problems start LOL.Keep smiling John, my best to Heidi.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning John, I will assume that when you read the reply&#8217;s, you will be in the air going home to your Heidi. I can only imagine how much you have missed her, and she you.</p><p>I have always thought that Sean was the best Bond, he was sexy has all get out and even today he still is. Roger was very good and I did enjoy him as Bond. But then nobody asked my opinion when they started changing the Bond actors. Go with what you know, and what the audience wants. It really is that simple, you do not have to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. The name&#8217;s Bond, James Bond, classic line. I would think that they would not allow an Englishman in the movie theater knowing they would have it embedded in their brains just what Mr. Bond has said in all the other movies.</p><p>Safe flight w/o any problems. But then with your luck, that probably will not happen. There is just something about John and flying in the same sentence and that is where the problems start LOL.</p><p>Keep smiling John, my best to Heidi.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 420/423 objects using disk: basic

Served from: johnhealdsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 17:09:00 -->
